US Attorney's Office KNOWINGLY Proceeded With Evidence-Against Siegelman-Which Was COERCED & FALSE

US Attorney's Office KNOWINGLY Proceeded With Evidence-Against Siegelman-Which Was COERCED & FALSE
...
Corruption in a U.S. Attorney’s Office | DEPARTMENT No Comment | BY Scott Horton |
PUBLISHED February 10, 2008
...
The implication of these passages is quite clear. White was being pressed to give false evidence against Siegelman in his trial in Montgomery, and was being threatened with the prospect of a corruption investigation and prosecution if he did not do so. In particular he was to have placed the initial meeting on a certain date, which the prosecutors needed to make out to sustain their case. White refused to give false evidence. The prosecution followed. These accusations, if true, amount to a corrupt manipulation of the criminal justice system, a felony.

Judy White’s affidavit provides strong evidence that the prosecutors knowingly proceeded against Siegelman on the basis of evidence or claims that they knew or should have known were false. And even more substantial evidence to the same end will very shortly appear in the media. ...